EDA Seattle Opening Session: Cluster Evolution and Technology Commercialization

At the EDA Seattle Region 2010 Western Regional Conference, Duane Roth, CEO of CONNECT, kicked off the opening plenary by discussing industry cluster development and what he sees as the emerging types of cluster models.  CONNECT was formed 25 years ago to assist in the commercialization of research in the San Diego area, which was uniquely positioned to develop a research and technology-based cluster, based on three initial institutions: the Scripps Research Institute, UC San Diego and the Salk Institute.  Defense and security was the initial industry cluster, followed by IT and wireless industries.  The life science and biotech industry also emerged as a major industry.  Additionally, energy /environmental as well as sports innovators have emerged as key industries.

Roth sees the concept of clusters as emerging “beyond clusters,” stating that “the products of today and tomorrow will be increasingly more sophisticated and require multiple types of technology.”  For example, he described the convergence of multiple industries by explaining the emerging relationship between the wireless industry and health care/life sciences, which has led to a new cluster, the Wireless Life Science Alliance.  Roth said, “Health care delivery in the future will be delivered via your cell phone.  More people today have cell phones than have shoes.”  The challenges will be to determine the complications involved in convergent clusters, and how to address those challenges.

Roth described the evolving models of innovation clusters.  Up through the 1970s, the “Fully-Integrated Model” saw the top innovations taking place at large corporations.  As leadership of corporations shifted from engineers and scientists to business and management professionals, innovation and risk-taking became more difficult.  By 1980, the “Co-Partner Model” saw research institutions able to own their research and write patents for their work.  In this model, research institutions were able to take more risks and start-up companies developed as partners.  This model has become less viable, and a new model is emerging.  According to Roth, the next phase will see the “Distributed Partner Model”, wherein multiple investors can spread the risk and production involved in developing new products, creating a production cluster.  Instead of everything being done in one facility with one staff, this model represents the convergence of multiple products and technologies together, which will allow developers to create many more products at a much faster pace.

The second speaker at the opening plenary session was Rohit Shukla, CEO of the Larta Institute.  Larta is an LA-based non-profit organization whose mission is to grow creative and productive communities through innovation.  Larta has evolved since its inception in 1993 from an innovation hub focused on Southern California to an organization that operates globally.  By developing and managing commercialization assistance strategies for companies in the early stages of development, Larta has created a global network of strong partners in research and innovation.  Here are a few of Shukla’s key points:

  • Global Imperative: We have to operate in a global context, and need to understand the impact of what we are doing on job creation and wealth creation globally.
  • Science and Engineering: There is a diminished interest in inquiry-based work.  We need to look at immigration policy reform and address the lack of engagement: “We cannot guarantee our communities’ future prosperity if we ignore the importance of science and engineering.”
  • Talent: There is mobility of talent, and talent can be brought in from anywhere in the world.
  • Assets: Consider a community’s assets and think of those in terms of global relevance.  Partner relentlessly and globally.
  • Entrepreneurship: Maintain a roadmap of opportunities, and know that everyone should have an entrepreneurial bent in their economic development strategy.
  • Commercialization of Research: We as a country have deviated from commercialization of innovation and research, and everyone needs to understand the challenges.
  • University Centers: Universities also need to be relentless in forming global partnerships.  They play a critical role in the process of discovering, but tend to be insular.
  • International Attention Deficit Disorder (IADD): We are constantly consuming bits of information but may fail to see the larger patterns.
  • Trust: Trust is established between and inside networks, and cultivating these networks is extremely important.

Finally, Shukla also mentioned the Small Business Innovation Research(SBIR) program, a little-known research program.  It is the only federal program funding research at small companies.  It is managed by U.S. Small Business Administration, but each agency maintains its own SBIR program.

Authored by Kathy Nothstine of the NADO Research Foundation

Study Ranks States by Adaptation to “New Economy”

A new study indicates varying degrees of adaptation by states to an innovation-based, global economy.  Funded by the Kauffman Foundation and authored by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), the 2010 State New Economy Index recognizes Massachusetts as the state leading the U.S. in adopting a more technologically dynamic, knowledge-driven economic structure, while the Plains States and southern states tend to be slower to follow suit.  

What follows has been excerpted from the original announcement by the Kauffman Foundation:

“In this century, the global economy has shifted,” said Robert Litan, vice president of Research & Policy at the Kauffman Foundation. “A mix of highly productive and innovative New Economy firms is necessary for an economy to prosper. The United States is lagging, and that lack of innovation-based vitality has contributed to our continuing recession. States need to concentrate on achieving New Economy success factors and providing the entrepreneurial resources and access that are critical to boosting competitiveness within the global marketplace.”

The State New Economy Index uses 26 indicators to assess states’ fundamental capacity to successfully navigate the shoals of economic change. It measures the extent to which state economies are knowledge-based, globalized, entrepreneurial, IT-driven and innovation-based – in other words, to what degree state economies’ structures and operations match the ideal structure of the New Economy. The 2010 Index builds on four earlier Indexes, published in 1999, 2002, 2007 and 2008.

“In today’s highly competitive environment, states must work together and with the federal government to overhaul their economic development policies,” said Dr. Robert D. Atkinson, president of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and co-author of the Index. “Too often, states still view their economic competitors as next door, rather than halfway around the world. If, instead, they used incentives to expand broadband, support entrepreneurial assistance programs, or invest in research and technology transfer, they – and the nation as a whole – would be far more globally competitive.”

The report recommends that, to pursue this new approach to economic development, states should 1) establish policies that reduce within-state zero-sum competition; 2) implement state policies to spur “win-win” economic results; and 3) pursue new state-federal innovation-based economic development partnerships.

TODAY IS NATIONAL ENTREPRENEURS’ DAY

“During National Entrepreneurship Week, we renew our commitment to supporting the entrepreneurs who power the engine of our Nation’s economy. These intrepid individuals translate their vision into products and services that keep America strong and competitive on a global scale, and build opportunity and prosperity across our country.”

President Barack Obama

Read President Obama’s Proclamation

By John Fernandez
U.S. Assistant Secretary of Commerce
for Economic Development

 

Throughout our history, the unparalleled freedoms that we enjoy as Americans have fueled an entrepreneurial culture that has made us the global leader in introducing new technologies and new ideas into the marketplace.

With President Obama’s proclamation setting November 14 through November 20, 2010, as National Entrepreneurship Week, today we celebrate National Entrepreneurs’ Day to honor our nation’s entrepreneurs and their role as catalysts for creating new industries, businesses and jobs.

We’ve come a long way since President Obama took office and committed to supporting entrepreneurial growth by pursuing a balanced approach to investing in the building blocks of innovation and providing a jump start for innovation in sectors of national importance.

Under the President’s National Innovation Strategy we are building that new foundation for sustainable growth to not only to usher in a new expansion, but making sure it is more enduring, rewarding, and broad-based than previous ones.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act served as the cornerstone for this new foundation by pumping $100 billion into the economy to help us tackle some of the grand challenges of the 21st century in diverse fields from healthcare IT and health research, to clean energy, to smart grids, and high speed trains.  Recovery Act investments are creating a virtuous cycle of investment, innovation, and job creation that have so far led to the creation of 3 million new jobs.

And with additional major steps, including the President’s National Export Initiative (NEI) and the recent passage of the Small Business Jobs Act we are making sure that American entrepreneurs are strengthened and have the resources they need to compete globally.

At EDA, our Office of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (OIE) is working to ensure that we are helping communities and regions accelerate the creation new products, new industries and new jobs.

The $12 million i6 Challenge, which was run through OIE, highlighted President Obama’s commitment to support public sector and social innovation through the use of high-risk, high-reward policy tools and is supporting the nation’s best ideas for technology commercialization and entrepreneurship in six different regions of the country.

While much progress has been made to support entrepreneurial development, we know there is a lot more work we can do to assure our competitiveness and I can assure you of the ongoing commitment by the President and his administration in support of American businesses and entrepreneurs.

To hear more about what the administration has planned to promote innovation-based, high-growth entrepreneurship, I am pleased to let you know that the White House will host a special live chat with Commerce Secretary Gary Locke today, Friday, November 19th at 1:00 PM EST.

Submit your question now at fastcompany.com, and Fast Company editors will select as many as they can to pose to the Secretary on Friday.  During the event, you can also submit questions at whitehouse.gov/live or on facebook.

Driving Rural Innovation in Kansas

Forming clusters of economic activity is a concept that can often fall flat in rural regions.   Limited suppliers, human capital and support infrastructure can often make it difficult for economic growth to transcend the number of miles between one rural town and the next.

The Advanced Manufacturing Institute (AMI) in north central Kansas is attempting to change the paradigm of traditional clustering through their recently launched Kansas Opportunity Innovation Network (KOIN), a three-year project funded by the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA).

Jeff Tucker, Associate Director of AMI, defines KOIN as an extension of prior efforts to create an innovative environment that transcends geographic isolation through new market development, knowledge transfer and strategically attracting suppliers that can support the existing economic base.  Their initial project with the North Central Regional Planning Commission can be found here.

“Traditionally, entrepreneurs will go to the edge of their community, look back and say, ‘what does this town need that I can provide’,  but ideally they should be thinking in terms of what the world needs that the community can offer,” says Tucker.

With a diverse mix of industries represented in any one region, Tucker asserts that it becomes even more important for unrelated businesses to share ideas and explore synergistic competencies as a means for improving a regional economy for the greater good.

As an EDA-funded University Center, allies of the KOIN initiative include Kansas State University, Kansas Association of Regional Development Organizations, Kansas, Inc. and Kansas Department of Commerce.

Innovating the Green Economy in California Regions

Innovating the Green Economy in California Regions
An economic development case for developing an environmentally amenable strategy for growth

Crossing the Next Regional Frontier

Crossing the Next Regional Frontier
Information and analytics linking regional competitiveness to investment in a knowledge-based economy

Regionalism and Clusters

Regionalism and Clusters for Local Economic Development Needs
Survey results addressing practitioner priorities for organizational and community development, the perception of concepts relating to industrial clustering and regionalism, and the training needs required to drive successful development.

Unlocking Rural Competitiveness

Unlocking Rural Competitiveness:  The Role of Regional Clusters
Industry cluster, workforce and demographic indicators for all states and counties nationwide

StatsAmerica.org

StatsAmerica.org
Tools offered by the Indiana Business Research Center to help regions guide strategic conversations about where to invest scarce resources in order to build toward prosperity

Texas Association of Regional Councils

Title: Texas Association of Regional Councils
Date: (March 9 – 10 in Austin, Texas)

View Power Point Presentation